Russian

CONTENTS

Section II

8) War as a commodity

NATO – WAR PRODUCER AND PURCHASER
COMMODITY “BALKAN WAR”
WE SAY NATO – IMPLY UNO
ONE YEAR BEFORE “UN – YUGOSLAVIA” WAR
WAR IS SOLD OUT
BRAND NEW WORLD IN BALKANS
“FOX” IN MACEDONIA
FASCISM AND NATO: HISTORIC PARALLELS
NATO “FOR PEACE”
NATO NEW MEMBERS
NATO “POSTGRADUATES”
ORDINARY NATO PARTNERS
MATERIAL SECURITY OF NATO EXPANSION
PRACTICAL EXCERCISES OF NATO EXPANSION
SPECIAL NATO PARTNERS FROM CIS COUNTRIES
UKRAINE AND NATO
NATO AND RUSSIA
NATO NEW AGE
THE THIRD WORLD WAR. COLD AND WARM
NEW REGIONAL LEADERS
NECCESSITY OR INEVITABILITY OF WAR?
FASCISM – THE LAST RESORT
CASUS BELLI
NUTOPIA

ONE YEAR BEFORE "UN - YUGOSLAVIA" WAR

11 February, inauguration of the NATO Documentation Centre for European Security Issues at the Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences (INION) in Moscow. Alliance conquered “information foothold” in the capital of Russia.
Peacemaking: 20 February, NATO announces readiness to organise and lead a mul-tinational force in Bosnia and Herzegovina after the expiry of SFOR’s mandate in June 1998, subject to UN Security Council mandate. 25 February, the Secretary General of NATO welcomes the agreement between the UN Secretary General and Iraq on a diplomatic situation to the Iraq crisis(??). NATO’s chief emphasizes importance of immediate and unconditional access to be provided for the UN weapons of destruction inspectors (according the resolutions of Security Council) to factories in Iraq where to Washington opinion chemical and biological weapon is produced. 4 March, the North Atlantic Council welcomes UN Security Council Resolution 1154 relating to Iraq and gives its strong support to UN insistence on full compliance by Iraq.
5 March, the North Atlantic Council issues a statement expressing its concern over recent violent incidents in Kosovo and calls on all sides to take immediate steps to reduce tensions. The Council issues a statement supporting the efforts of the OSCE Mission to Croatia relating to the resettlement of refugees and displaced persons and reminds Croatia of its obligations under the Bosnian Peace Agreement. Thus, NATO for the first time audibly expressed their “concern” on opposition in Serbian province Kosovo where kosovar extremists suddenly appeared. Then the events move very fast. Now we go by dates of the year 1998.
11 March, Ambassadors and representatives of EAPC countries discuss the serious developments in Kosovo and enumerate the conditions needed for peaceful settlement. Did political-diplomatic fuss start around this Kosovo? No, it started around Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 28-29 May, at the meeting of the North Atlantic Council, NATO Foreign Ministers issue a statement expressing concern over the situation in Kosovo and outline measures being taken to contain the crisis and to seek a peaceful resolution. Simultaneously internation media at all possible levels controlled by Euro-American bigger capital began their campaign of making image of fascist Yugoslavian regime.
Establishment of the Euro-Atlantic Disaster Response Coordination Centre (EADRCC) at NATO under the aegis of the EAPC.
At the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council Meeting in Luxembourg, NATO and Russia condemn nuclear tests conducted by India and Pakistan. 30 May, the NATO Secretary General did the same and condemns further nuclear tests by Pakistan and calls on India and Pakistan to halt nuclear and missile testing, adhere to the NPT (non-proliferation treaty) and CTBT and begin a dialogue to reduce tensions.
11-12 June, the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council (Defence Ministers) agrees to continue NATO-Russia cooperation in SFOR and condemns Belgrade’s use of force in Kosovo as well as attacks by Kosovar extremists
2-3 July, NATO Information Seminar takes place in Sarajevo, aimed at encouraging the development of democratic practices in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
9 December, the NATO-Russian Permanent Joint Council meets at foreign minister level. Ministers review implementation of the 1998 PJC Work Programme, welcoming progress made on developing a strong, stable partnership and emphasising the usefulness of the PJC in promoting consultation, coordination, and joint action.
The NATO-Ukraine Commission meets at foreign minister level. Ministers review the implementation of the NATO-Ukraine Charter and agree on the work programme for 1999. A Memorandum of Understanding is signed concerning the appointment of two NATO Liaison Officers in Kyiv. NATO Ministers welcome the announcement of Ukraine's "State Programme of Cooperation with NATO to the Year 2001". It might be thought that Russia and Ukraine derelict territories.
December 1998, Desert Fox mission being held by the US and UK against Iraq and consisting of bassive air strikes of Iraqi industrial targets suspected in production of massive destruction weapons. As a matter of fact the “conflict” lies in different plane. By December 1998 dollar dropped down in currency markets by his lowest level that was caused by the threadt of Bill Clinton impeachment due to sexual scandal. It was required to save the situation. As soon as air strikes started, oh miracle, dollar was balanced again, currency and stock markets calmed down with respect to the US economy.
The year 1998 is marked with “growing international concern” on “repressions and ethnic cleansing” carried by Serbian government against kosovan Albanians. This ‘concern’ mostly inspired by media. “Different diplomatic initiatives and talks could not convince the government of president Milosevic to change their policy” – declares official NATO site. But what was beneath the events around Kosovo which were used by the “world community” presented by NATO for the direct invasion in Yugoslavia. Besides this, NATO’s air strikes in another country (Iraq) became routine.
We see new technology of transformation of hostile and derelict space into frendly ones instead of aggressive invasion with the use of dogs of war. There we may find the principal accent – footing on local forces (ethnic of religious). Technology was tested in Afghanistan where the chaos took over after soviet troops leaving. In nothern provinces of Pakistan where pusthtuns live new divisions of afganistan movement was formed by pakistanian intelligence and the movement had been named “Taliban”. This Taliban monement appeared from no quarter during several months went through the country and took over three third of the territory .
One of the secrets of success was in uninterrupted supply of weapons and ammunition and also in participation of pakistanian officers of pusthun nationality on Taliban side. Besides this it was known that all pakistanian military camps preparing hits for Afganistan were under guardianship of the US CIA. Approximately during these years the same techniques is successfully applied in Central Africa. Literally within several years small bu militant nation tootsie living on vast territory set control over number of countries. Tootsie nation that made the framework of Uganda army came to help their tribesmen in Burundi and Rwanda. Then they assisted their tribesmen in Zair. As a result in a short time they took over the capitol and overthrew former regime. It would hardly happlen if the bigger international business will be interested in the events around the territory of the former Belgium Congo. In this place the half of the world uranium mining is concentrated. This place is also rich with copper, cobalt, diamond and tantalus oxide deposits. It was not by chance that after first “congolese crisis” of 1960 when people government led by P.Lumumba nearly appeared African department was founded in CIA as well as American intelligence presence in Africa was enlarged. .
All three campaigns, afganian, central African and present balkanian, go the same scenario. Technology remains the same. Each war is forestalled by civil war and ethnic cleansing which cause great flow of refugees in allied territories with ethnically related population .
There at peculiar footfolds which are controlled mostly by pro-american authorities they established bases and headquarters of future army. Simultaneosly they screen and select command personnel. There is no shortage in recruits; they are gathered from refugees that are bloody-minded and easy conceiving nationalism as idea of ‘national emansipation’. Here under guidance of professional instructors they study accelerated training. After training divisions of rebels consolidated by regular army officers of relative country they begin pitched battle. The lack of professionalism is well compensated by high militant spirit of such armies, they are inspired by the sense of revenge and literally fight for the “motherland”.
At the same time rebel armies are greatly depended of rears on the territories of neighbouring (relative) countries, of regular supply of weapons and of good financing via dummy accounts substantiated by CIA, NATO and Pentagon and other institutions struggling for “national liberation” and for the human rights in trhough bourgeois world. Therefore these armies are quite manageable. Yet there is a danger that “rebel armies” can get out of control right after victory. The example is Afganistan talibs which became very obstinate when they took over power or Albanians in Kosovo which did not calm after NATO forces were deployed there. They have continued their great march to the South of Serbia (Preshevo valley) and to Macedonia. Nationalism has no brake.
So the current boundary of NATO’s incrusion is Republic Yugoslavia. It should be captured by the same internal ethnic conflict. Albanians in Kosovo province were well enough for this porpose. According the Sunday Times yet in 1996 CIA establish close contacts with Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) in northern regions of Albania and during the OSCE commission working in Kosovo these relation were consolidated substantially. Mission was led by American diplomat W.Walker who was suspected CIA related during his work as US ambassador in Salvador.
Moreover after evacuation of mission americans left satellite communication system and guidance system to Albanian hits so commanders of KLA could directrly speak by phone to NATO Commander in Chief in Europe and to american general W.Clark as well as to Washington. CIA agents that operated in Kosovo in 1998 as OSCE mission watchers carried out work on studying KLA soldiers. Albanian community of the USA had managed delivery of sniper riffles to Kosovo. It was done under colour of procurement of weapons for hunting clubs allegedly organised by KLA in Albania. .
Beginning of opposition of Kosovar Albanians and Serbian leadership was put in 1989 when S.Milosevic took away Kosovo province autonomy. In February 1990 troops, tanks, planes and 2000 policemen were sent to Kosovo. From time to time inter-ethnic clashes took place. In July 1990 Kosovo assembly declared independence of province; after that it was dismissed by Belgrade. In 1991 Bosnian war had began; the parliament of neighbouring Albania acknowledged Kosovo as independent republic. In May 1992 the writer I.Rugova was elected president of self-declared republic. In October the same year Serbian leadership and Kosovar Albanians met each other for talks. But the talks failed. In 1993 more than 30 Albanian were arrested suspected in preparation of mutiny. In August 1995 Belgrade resettled several hundreds of refugees from Croatia; it aroused anger of local ethnic leaders. In1996 right at the moment when CIA specialist were here it is noticed growign activity of underground Army of Kosovo Liberation after series of blasts. In 1997 fierce clashes of Albanian extremists with police and Serbian forces had been developed, attacks on police precincts, on Serbian refugees camps; rector of Pristina university of Serbian nationality was heavily injured etc.
Critical pressure in “Albanian boiler” was reached in 1997 when economic crisis occurred in the country aggravated by disruption of financial pyramids. National economy was found in chaos. Crowds of armed people (weapon was grabbed from stores and arsenals) run around the whole territory. The country is about at the state of civil war. This collective aggression had to be channeled somewhere. There was a chance – idea of “Great Albania” (including part of Greece, Macedonia and Yugoslavia) the same empire fairy-tale for idiots fooled by temptations of bourgeois civilization. And the volunteers trained by CIA are available now.
And now on 15 April 1997 the first of 6000 “humanitarian” Italian-led multinational security landing force arrived at Tirana’s airport. Operation Alba aims at the protection of humanitarian aid to Albania, since Albania was at the state of serious economic crisis close to chaos. From that moment we may start counting of NATO forces official pressence in direct closeness to Yugoslavian border. Scenario working-out under general title “national liberation” or “human rights protection” which were developed in Afganistan with talibs and in Central Africa with tootsie nation, enriched by experience of “peacemaking” in Croatia, Bosnia ana Herzegovina had been started against bigger Yugoslavia from Albanian territory. Global bourgeois television had a great contribution to these pre-war operations.
Further, in May 1997 WEU (military-political organisation established in 1954) decided to send Multinational Advisory Police Element (MAPE) to Albania as a part of “world community” efforts especially of OSCE and EC. The main task of MAPE was in consultations and training of instructors.
Military, diplomatic, political and information-psychological preparation of NATO forces invasion had began long before the 24 March 1999.
In February-March of 1998 ethnic Albanians elected president and parliament of Kosovo. Belgrade considered these elections illegal. Serbia in turn hold a referendum on the issue on foreign intervention in Yugoslavia. 95% of Serbs voted against intervention.
So on 5 March 1998, the North Atlantic Council issues a statement expressing its concern over recent violent incidents in Kosovo and calls on all sides to take immediate steps to reduce tensions. 28-29 May, at the meeting of the North Atlantic Council, NATO Foreign Ministers issue a statement expressing concern over the situation in Kosovo and outline measures being taken to contain the crisis and to seek a peaceful resolution. 11-12 June, the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council (Defence Ministers) agrees to continue NATO-Russia cooperation in SFOR (Bosnia!) and condemns Belgrade’s use of force in Kosovo as well as attacks by Kosovar extremists. Rebels were already authoritatively named as “side” in some previous statements.
15 June 1998, NATO air exercise “Determined Falcon” takes place in Albania and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in “agreement with the respective governments”. The skills of air strikes worked out will be very useful for Alliance forces so soon.
12 August, leadership of NATO continued to form information environment favourable for the future war operation. J.Solana expresses “deep concern” over the continuing violence in Kosovo, indicating that the North Atlantic Council had reviewed military planning for options to bring an end to the violence and create conditions for negotiations. Good goal and its “means” are declared now! 14 September, NATO Secretary General Javier Solana calls on all sides to show restraint and establish conditions for a return to a peaceful and stable environment throughout Albania. NATO General Secretary openly acknowledged that civil war takes place in Albania, and one of the pivots of this war is radical extremism known as nationalism. And nationalism as we know feeds with blood. Therefore this evil energy have to be channeled to the right bed, the bed is desireable for the war “creditors”.
30 September, at a meeting of the Permanent Joint Council, NATO and Russia discuss continuation of NATO-Russia cooperation in SFOR and “reiterate concern” about the humanitarian situation in Kosovo.
13 October, the “world community” in the absence of compliance by the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia with UNSCR 1119, the North Atlantic Council reviews the situation in Kosovo and issues activation orders (ACTORDs) for both limited air strikes and a phased air campaign in Yugoslavia after approximately 96 hours. Such “bomb blackmail” this method was implemented in Bosnia, Sarajevo. And now it’s a common practice of UNO, which is NATO pretending to be a savior of the world ‘of its security’.
15 October, visits to NATO by the President of Latvia, and by the Prime Minister of Poland. NATO Secretary General visits Belgrade, accompanied by the Chairman of the Military Committee General Naumann and Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) General Clark, to insist upon full and immediate compliance by President Milosevic with UNSCR 1119 relating to Kosovo. Resolution calls for cease-fire by “both sides”, stop captureing hostages (this way UN entitles military prisons – Serbs and KLA soldiers) and commencement of political dialogue, dialogue of legal Yugoslavian government with nationalistic extremists. UN Resolution put both sides on the same level and menacing visit of two general to NATO HQ had to put an end to Milosevic resistance. To comply with UN Resolution on Yugoslavia meant to acknowledge illegal military formations and their territorial claims as legal; and to start with dialoge meant to give away part of the territory to those who fight for “Great Albania” inspired by the “world community” of bigger capital. As a result of the visit agreement is signed on air verification force over Kosovo.
13-15 October, under the aegis of the NATO Air Defence Committee, a first joint exercise is held at Kayseri airbase in Turkey, involving the strategic loading of a NATO mobile air defence radar by a Russian Illuyshin 76 heavy transport aircraft. The exercise is in preparation for potential cooperation in combined peace support operations. Moreover, it’s not a long time to wait. 16 October, the North Atlantic Council announces its decision to maintain its readiness to launch air operations against Yugoslavia and extends the period before execution of air strikes to 27 October.
Further, 20, 24-25th October, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) General Clark meets Serbian leadership in Belgrade over the Kosovo crisis, then 24-25 Clark return to Belgrade to meet the Serbian leadership over the Kosovo crisis. Importance of the word “crisis” that was multiplied thousand times in world media is incontestable. In October Western governments called their citizens to leave Yugoslavia since NATO is already prepared for bombing.
27th of October, NATO Secretary General Javier Solana issues a statement noting improvement of the security and humanitarian situation in Kosovo following the decisions taken by the North Atlantic Council on 13 October; reaffirming the need for full compliance with UNSCR 1119 and 1203; announcing the maintenance of NATO’s ACTORD for limited air operations subject to decision and assessments by the Council and maintenance of the ACTORD for a phased air campaign; and calling for equal compliance with UNSC Resolutions by the Kosovar Albanians.
19 November, again the North Atlantic Council expresses concern about the deteriorating situation in Kosovo, insisting that all parties must comply fully with relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions.
And on 26 November NATO Secretary General and Supreme Allied Commander Europe visit the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to discuss the situation in Kosovo with President Kiro Gligorov and senior government officials. Let’s note that “UN” and NATO forces are already deployed in Macedonia. Then on the 30th of November NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council once again discusses NATO-Russia cooperation in SFOR in Bosnia and Herzegovina and ways to cooperate in support of the international verification mission in Kosovo like if Kosovo is yet handing over under NATO and ‘partners’ jurisdiction. “Visitors” of NATO HQ are ought to say yes because they have nothing to oppose inherently to “concern about peace and security” in Europe lands.
2 December, it is announced that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia agrees to allow a NATO force to be stationed on its territory, to evacuate international personnel involved in the OSCE verification mission in neighbouring Kosovo, if called upon to do so. As you can see everything is prepared for the completion of the plan conventionally named as the “former Yugoslavia”.
Thus, the whole 1998 was practically spent by “world community” for information-political run-up to Yugoslavian war. The most international bureaucratic structures fed by world capital were engaged such as UNO, OSCE, EC, WEU; and governments of different countries, inter-governmental and non-governmental institutions all of them express their decisiveness to support and even to take part in punishment of “aggressor”.
But there was a need in some incident, large scale provocation which should be combined with so-called negotiation process. This will explode indignation of “world community” for the hot phase of the war to be commenced. Here come the year 1999. All vectors of different forces were crossed at “Kosovo”.
13 January 1999, following the growing tension in Kosovo between ethnic Kosovar Albanians and the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY), NATO representatives have been meeting regularly at NATO HQ, Brussels. During talks between General Klaus Naumann, General Wesley Clark and President Slobodan Milosevic in Belgrade, the Serb president clearly adopted an uncooperative position. As a result, further meetings are being held at NATO HQ between member countries and with Russia to discuss possible solutions to the crisis.
17 января NATO Secretary General, on behalf of the North Atlantic Council, condemns the massacre of Kosovar Albanians by Serb forces in Racak and calls on the Yugoslav authorities to cooperate fully with the ICTY in accordance with UN resolutions and to bring those responsible to justice.
Next day 18 January NATO Generals Wesley Clark, Supreme Allied Commander Europe, and Klaus Naumann, Chairman of the Military Committee, go to Belgrade to impress upon the Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic the gravity of the situation in Kosovo.
20 January, it was decided to turn large scale provocation prepared in NATO bosom into world show. World media for a long time yet uses the wording “crisis in Kosovo”. NATO increases its military preparations just to strengthen the “demands of world community”. NATO allies, representative of OSCE and EC as well as Contract Group (including France, Germany, Italy, Russia, UK and USA) review a “set of different options to support efforts of the world community to bring Yugoslavian government back to negotiations” » .
28 January, the growing “cooperation” between the United Nations (UN) and NATO was further reinforced, with the visit of the UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, to NATO. This was the first time a UN Secretary General had ever made an official visit to NATO HQ, Brussels. That’s the fact UN Secretary General visited NATO HQ and not vice versa. This way the pressure on Yugoslavia by NATO forces was raised on the international level and UNO got a new status, ‘Daughter Company’ of NATO. The last circumstance is especially important at the eve of the coming war of “world community” in the name of NATO countries against Yugoslavia. K.Annan the chief of UNO discussed “crisis in Kosovo” and situation in Bosnia.
And now move back to “tragedy in Racak village”, to this provocation of the “world community” for it was organized to make bombing of Yugoslavia justified.
As a matter of fact in January 1999 squads of Serbian police killed 45 Albanians. Serbs did not make a secret of the fact that those killed were hits of Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) which open fire from roadblock. Behind this international vanity nobody mentioned that nationalistic extremists made the whole “Army”, not a squad of small unit – the Army that was equipped enough to oppose regular forces and police troops of Serbia. Therefore this version about “peaceful citizens” has nothing to do with reality.
Representatives of OSCE headed by mentioned above W.Walker (CIA ‘specialist’) urgently arrived to the place Racak. Those arrived called this “genocide crime”. Mr. Walker declared about this all over the world. He did not allow representatives of Yugoslavian leadership to Racak as well as prosecution investigators and Yugoslavian journalists, and stated that he was a witness of massacre. Next day he called press-conference for foreign and Albanian journalists and told about brutality toward peaceful population . Even accent was made on the fact that “quiet” citizens of Albanian nationality were killed. However, Kosovo province is settled not only by Albanians but by Serbs, Gypsies, and Macedonians etc. Why did they refer to only “two sides” of opposition in all high level statements? Even in this we may recognise nasty job of CIA, NATO and UN bureaucrats in course of their working up of dealing with Yugoslavian regime.
In January 1999 we face with show that was set ant performed by OSCE-CIA specialists aligned with camera crews of American and European television, the show “tragedy in Racak village”. According the official version of global media Serbs killed 45 “peaceable Albanians”. This takes place at the eve of negotiations in February-March in Rambouillet, France. Serbian and Albanian delegations have been trying to negotiate at the presence of western representatives who play the roles of conductors.
In parallel to training of Albanian hits they have been continue with massive information working up of the oncoming attack on Yugoslavia. Global bourgeois television that is well paid widely discussed and enormously replicated the phrase “mass massacre” spreading hatred toward Serbian regime which was known by common peoples of Europe and America as fascist regime. NATO forces in effect have got a moral right and applause for punishment of Yugoslavia and legally elected president.
Belarusian and Finnish experts visited Racak had found that the clothes of dead was deliberately changed after their death. The corpses were moved; on their arms they’ve found taints of gunpowder. This is the evidence that “peaceful citizens” held weapons in their arms and shot before they were killed. Their clothes however were unharmed while the bullet traces were on their corpses. As a matter of fact Racak was the centre of KLA at that time. There was no mass massacre. It was just a combat action between Serbs and Albanians. Then the stage version was made followed by monstrous information provocation. . More recent investigations in November 1999 involved Dr. Helen Rant from Finland confirmed this. The results were sent to Hague. Although by this moment the war was over and the money assigned for it was spent.
To some extent this prevocational technique had been reflected in American motion picture “Wag the dog” that was shot not long before the actual events “performed alive”.
And before this dramatic period yet on 29 January, Contact Group called Yugoslavia to start negotiations in Rambouillet, France. 6 February, NATO has announced that it is prepared to support these peace efforts with military force, if necessary, including the use of air strikes against targets on FRY territory should both parties refuse to comply with the conditions set out by the “international community”.
Milosevic regime rather than “both parties” of the conflict was found under combined pressure of the United Nations, NATO, the OSCE the EU and the Contact Group despite the words said by NATO officials. 30 January, if negotiations fail, it should be recalled that NATO decided to authorise the Secretary General to order military action to bring about an end to the conflict. In the meantime J.Solana of NATO travels along the northern and southern member countries of Alliance raising support of world ‘elite’ to bombing-pedagogic action toward Yugoslavia. They spread air strikes against Serbian positions responsible for conducting repression in Kosovo.
Yet on 8 February in course of his voyage to Spain and meeting with local leader J.Solana discusses details of operation Joint Guardian concerning the deployment of NATO forces in Kosovo. In other words by 8 February the issue of offensive into Yugoslavia is already solved. So far Serbians are not aware of it.
6 February, peace negotiations started in Rambouillet. The decision made on 30 January by the NAC to delegate to the Secretary General the authority to initiate air strikes, stands as a warning to both sides that NATO's threat to use force is real and to underline the pressing need to reach an agreement. The show goes on.
10 February, NATO is monitoring developments at Rambouillet closely and stands ready to play its part in the international community's efforts to bring about a peaceful resolution (and ‘operation’ can’t be cancelled) of the crisis. At the same time the NATO Extraction Force, under operation Joint Guarantor and based in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, is ready to assist the OSCE , if required, with the extraction of Kosovo Verification Mission observers and the NATO-led aerial surveillance over Kosovo continues under operation Eagle Eye.
16 February. Approximately 20 000 soldiers are participating in a NATO exercise, Battle Griffin 99, from 16 February to 3 March in central Norway. The exercise involves the deployment of NATO forces in a crisis situation with the aim of practicing the Alliance's readiness to secure the collective defence of its members. Land, sea, air and Home Guard Forces from 8 NATO countries (Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, the United Kingdom and the United States) are involved
23 February, NATO welcomes the substantial progress made in the Kosovo Peace Talks in Rambouillet and looks forward to the Implementation Conference on 15th March, 1999. The Secretary General has called upon both parties to build on the considerable progress achieved at Rambouillet and to seize the opportunity to achieve a lasting peace J.Solana calls both parties to follow cease-fire. This phrase means that “both parties” are weaponed or that they are not “peaceable citizens” that were spoken about with respect to Racak massacre. The core of NATO’s blah-blah is that it confirms readiness to initiate air strikes on Yugoslavia; this is the argument in “peace” talks. 24 February, since the beginning Kosovo peace talks at Rambouillet, NATO is still monitoring the situation on the ground closely. In recent days, the Secretary General, Dr Javier Solana, has expressed his deep concern about the violence in Kosovo. “Doctor’s” deep concern is explainable. Being a “doctor” he calls both parties to “stop human sufferings”.
By the beginning of March 1999 KLA was almost wholly overrun by Serbian troops during the last week decided to intercept communications of Serbian army. It was not envisaged by long-term plan of Yugoslavian federation undertook by American and European capitals.
3 March. The situation in Kosovo remains high on the agenda of the North Atlantic Council and member nations of the Alliance. NATO officials continue to make clear the Alliance's readiness to support the efforts of the international community and those of Ambassadors Hill, Petritsch, and Mayorski as they seek to negotiate an interim peace agreement for Kosovo. Allied air forces also remain ready to conduct air strikes when necessary, if an agreement cannot be reached. Please notice that nobody in Rambouillet set the issue about bringing of NATO troops (and withdrawal of Serbian ones) yet. That notorious “plan B” suddenly appears at the end of “negotiations” as ultimatum to FRY.
15 March, the negotiations on an Interim Peace Agreement for Kosovo were resumed in Paris. In response to an invitation from the Conference organisers, NATO has sent a delegation of civilian and military officials to provide advice to the negotiators on military implementation issues during the Conference. Alliance is still ready “to solve the issue by military means” to make Yugoslavia to fulfill “agreement”.
However, the Alliance has followed with concern, the increasing level of violence in and around Kosovo, and the failure of both parties to comply with relevant Security Council Resolutions and other agreements, which have as their objective to create conditions conducive to finding a peaceful solution to the current crisis.

THE WAR IS SOLD

23 March. At the conclusion of the negotiations on an Interim Peace Agreement for Kosovo the Kosovar Albanian delegation signed the Interim Peace Agreement, but the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) delegation refused to do so due to “plan B”, which appeared suddenly as ultimatum for Belgrade. Yet before this on 22 March the Secretary General of NATO consulted with all Allies in accordance with the authority delegated to him by the North Atlantic Council on 30 January, about the launching of air operations following the “suspension of the talks” on 19 March. And in this case it is clear that even without signing an agreement by Yugoslavian side the bombing war against Yugoslavia was predetermined. As it was before Alliance “noticed” growing level of violence against civil population and other tales of prepaid international media. Therefore on 23 March (he was in hurry) he had directed SACEUR to initiate air operations in FRY aimed at “halting the violence and bringing to an end the humanitarian crisis in Kosovo”, preventing the spread of instability in the region and securing a political settlement.
24 March, operation Allied Force began “after months of intense effort by the International Community to find a political solution to the crisis in Kosovo”. NATO's decision to resort to the use of force was taken only after it became clear that all efforts to achieve a negotiated, political solution to the Kosovo crisis had failed and no other alternative was open, - informs NATO site. So it is getting easier to lie from now on. The war had begun. And the causer is known in advance.
Alliance is now intended to carry out operation against police and military “targets” aiming at annihilation and weakening of Yugoslavian government ability to continue with “terror campaign toward civil population of Kosovo in order to prevent further humanitarian disaster and avoid extension of instability in the region” – defames official NATO site. “This expansion against military structure of FRY will enforce destruction of strategic targets of Yugoslav army despite essential risk (!). Each action to be carried out should avoid collateral damage. But should we consider hundreds of thousands of refugees due to bombing as a “collateral damage” after 24 March, and not before this date?
31 March, as NATO states, so far, more than 430,000 deportees have flowed into neighbouring countries since 24 March 1999, to find refuge from the Serb Army and special police units. And certainly, the Alliance is providing assistance to tens of thousands of refugees who have been driven from their homes. Individual NATO member countries are temporarily taking in refugees and organising airlifts. NATO forces already in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - the ARRC: the Allied Command Europe (ACE) Rapid Reaction Corps – have set up a "tented city" to assist thousands of refugees coming over the border. Food, medical supplies and a water purification plant “have already been supplied”. (It was prepared long before and money was envisaged). NATO has opened up a relief supply route for helicopters between Tirana and Kukes on the border. General Sir Michael Jackson went to Albania “for consultations”.
By 4 April big noise was made by NATO’s gang which was fixed by Yugoslavian-aimed air strikes. The North Atlantic Council holds a meeting at NATO HQ with EU member states, the OSCE Chairman-in-office, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, the Council of Europe and the Western European Union to coordinate efforts to address the grave humanitarian crisis caused by the actions of Serb forces in Kosovo.
9 Apri,l J.Solana makes a statement rejecting cease-fire proposed by Belgrade as insufficient and stresses that Milosevic must meet the demands set by the “world community”: a peaceful multi-ethnic democratic Kosovo in which all its people live in security. This would mean that operations in Kosovo will continue until president Milosevic fulfill NATO demands:
a) a verifiable stop to all military action and the immediate ending of violence and repression (even in this way of spelling Global Lie being copied by Alliance can be distincted); b) the withdrawal from Kosovo of the Yugoslav military, police and paramilitary forces; c) the stationing in Kosovo of an international military “presence”; d) the unconditional and safe return of all refugees and displaced persons and unhindered access to them by humanitarian (like NATO – AB) aid organisations; e) credible assurance of Milosevic's willingness to work on the basis of the Rambouillet Accords towards a political solution for Kosovo. Let’s remind we are talking about sovereign state Yugoslavia that was invaded by 19 NATO members.
The lie might be of another kind: foreign ministers “condemned Yugoslavian leadership which uses refugees as a mean of destabilization in other countries of region”. It seems that big flow of refugees caused by something different than NATO air strikes.
Yet by the end of March after several weeks of bombing Europeans especially Germans were horrified: victims among civil population – Serbs, Albanians; destructions, the threat of ecological disaster in Europe. Was it the way to follow by? This is why one German provocation prepared in defense ministry was lent. Defense minister R.Sharping found so called “Potkova” plan handed over by some curious way from Austria to german foreign minister J.Fischer who passed it to defense ministry . Sharping was retired in July 2002 following the scandal that reminds the “writers’ case” (Chubais and others from Russia). Fischer in the very July was also under suspicion of court due to fee received for unpublished book. We may suggest that the book was identical “Potkova”, and the money paid was for that book.
“Potkova” Plan according to Sharping dealt with one operation of Serbian commandership on withdrawal of Albanians from Kosovo. Actually it was a range of report about status of Serbian army and several radios intercepts of Serbian troops talks; in other words papers were about the past events. In some of this ‘documents’ it was said about one task of Serbian commandership – neutralization of Army of Kosovo liberation as terrorist organization within Yugoslav territory. But Sharping and his bonnets glued the “Plan” from these pieces; that “Plan” was concerned with ethnic cleansing carrying out in Kosovo foisting the authorship to Yugoslavian leaders. World media picked this poisoned grain of German defense ministry all the more it was said that the “Plan” was made even before the war. “Potkova” Plan was so primitively made that even in the very German defense ministry it was found as fake. They just attached cover page «“Potkova” Plan» to the package of different reports so they got the ‘whole military plan’ false through since it hasn’t existed ever.
German journalists noted that the title “Potkova” used by military has Bulgarian but not Serbian origin. And in Serbian language it looks like “potkovitsa”.
However they made use of this provocation. The war is waged, money is assigned for it. NATO presenting now 19 countries starts military actions against independent state without sanction of the world community. It was untimely during the war to recall that long before the March of 1999 a huge amount of media companies worked a lot producing “information product” of the raw material coming from Balkan Peninsula. One of them was typical company “Rue de fines global public affairs”. Since 1991 it was busy with thorough collection and dressing data from Balkans. The chief of the company J.Haff was recognized by the fact that he was the first who push on the wording “concentration camps” into world public consciousness. It was the following way. There were camps for war prisoners and displaced persons. Haff took away the words “for war prisoners and displaced persons” and added the word “concentration” in front. So the whole world “got to know” that in Serbia already known as “aggressor” they have “concentration camps”. In other words, Yugoslavia led by Molosevic is a fascist regime. “Companies” making such kind of information were financed by NATO and CIA stakeholders and they supplied these “products” for overall TV-channels. It became ‘obvious’ for thousands and thousands of Europe and America citizens that crisis in Kosovo was a real thing.
However the world did not know that refugee camps were not only in Macedonia and Methokia but also on Yugoslavian territory where Kosovo refugees went too. And none asked question why escaping from Serbian repression they run inward Yugoslavia. The world everyman did not note as it seemed to that refugee mass relate to different nationalities: gypsies, Albanians-catholic which were made to join the army, to take guns and to fight against Serbia despite their wish. Nobody noted that refugees from Kosovo yet before the war were either Serbs escaping from Albanian extremists who used to attack Serbs and burn down their houses. They did not pay attention that the whole families of Albanians yet in 1998 have been leaving Kosovo. г. покидали Косово. То были семьи боевиков, которых те отправляли подальше от предстоящих боев.
World capital media won information war against Yugoslavia not even use the word “war”. They’ve just used glittering generality – “action to protect human rights”. The real catastrophe began in Yugoslavia after western invasion. The number of refugees got hundreds times more than before the war. Could it be otherwise if military operation plans of world capital were prepared and pre-paid long before this shot and widely distributed provocation? And this catastrophe is look absolutely the same as that in Czechoslovakia in 1938 when European nations not risking to deal with Hitler surrendered him Czech and Slovakia republics while some countries acquired pieces of their territories. This time the role of Hitler’s fascism is plaid by NATO-UNO as universal “peacemaker”.
After the war of 1999 we got to know more fact of massive falsifications for Europeans which tell about tens or hundreds of thousands Albanians murdered by Serbs. It was not the case. There were some accidents expressing national intolerance, aggression from Serbian side but never at the level of governmental policy as well as military activity of federal troops against extremist organization that was largely provided by weapons from abroad.

14 April, visit to NATO by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Sadako Ogata. Attention, UN Commissioner arrives to NATO HQ but not vice versa. The same day NATO continues its air strike campaign against targets in Yugoslavia since “ethnic cleansings being continued by Serbian troops. Moreover, allied forces are widely deploying in Albania .
23-25 April, during the Washington Summit, NATO members commemorated the Alliance's 50th anniversary and made a number of important statements on the Alliance's current and future agenda for the 21st Century under guidance of the USA. It seems that cold war is not over and aggressive block got a lot of jobs in Europe and Asia. And 50th anniversary was nicely saluted by bombing in Yugoslavia. Such background of the celebration allowed them easier to form global military strategy for NATO cohorts for the XXI century. In particular Alliance announced its main purposes as:
Security: 1) to provide one of the indispensable foundations for a stable Euro-Atlantic security environment;
2) Consultation: To serve as an essential transatlantic forum for Allied consultations on any issues that affect their vital interests (Article 4 of the Washington Treaty);
3) Deterrence and Defence: To deter and defend against any threat of aggression against any NATO member state (Articles 5 and 6 of the Washington Treaty).
Draw your attention on the facts that for the first time in new history this reference to two Washington Treaty articles sounds in such baleful context at the high level. There also about the plans in Euro-Atlantic region, 1) Crisis Management: To stand ready, case-by-case and by consensus, to contribute to effective conflict prevention and to engage actively in crisis management, including crisis response operations (Article 7 of the Washington Treaty); 2) Partnership: To promote wide-ranging partnership, cooperation, and dialogue with other countries in the Euro-Atlantic area, with the aim of increasing transparency, mutual confidence and the capacity for joint action with the Alliance
The Alliance welcomed the results of the work undertaken in close cooperation with the Western European Union (WEU) to build the European Security and Defence Identity (ESDI) within NATO based on the decisions taken in Brussels in 1994 and Berlin in 1996. The key elements of a strong European security pillar within the Alliance are now in place, thus permitting the European Allies to carry out their own, WEU-led operations drawing on NATO's assets and capabilities. This will strengthen the transatlantic link and Alliance solidarity as a whole. On this basis leader of governments and nations proposed range of principles for them to be carried out by Alliance in mentioned regions.
Given changing conditions of the present security NATO decided to improve its defense capabilities to guarantee efficiency of future multi-national operations together with the whole range of Alliance missions. The main focus is on improvement of operational interaction in regions in issues like: deployment and mobility of allied forces, its support and logistics, their subsistence and efficient utilization of opportunities as well as systems of commandership, management and information. So we found the reason why this large scale war in Yugoslavia was waged. They want to reach the next level of military operations and requirements to them; this implies growth of military spending and military activity not only in region of “atlantism” but substantially wider. World capitalism is dying, it is required to save him.
NATO initiates new projects within the framework “Partnership for Pease” (PfP). Two major documents were endorsed: the «Political-Military Framework for NATO-led PfP Operations» and «Towards a Partnership for the 21st Century - The Enhanced and more Operational Partnership» and «Mediterranean Dialogue», to the progressive strengthening, through enhanced political and practical co-operation, of NATO's Mediterranean Dialogue with Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Mauritania, Morocco and Tunisia. Thereat due to revised Strategic Concept of Alliance partners are more and more involved in military activity planned and carried out by the block.
Meanwhile the war in Yugoslavia still goes on.
28 April, NATO noted increasing flood of refugees into countries bordering on Kosovo continues. According to the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), Albania has now taken in almost 400,000 refugees; the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) 204,000; and Montenegro 62,000.
29 April, the Allies have intensified their air campaign against targets in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia including Serb forces in Kosovo. The Alliance welcomed the decision of the EU to impose an oil embargo and the readiness of several non-NATO countries to join this initiative in order to further isolate the Belgrade regime. At a press conference at NATO headquarters on 29 April, US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott outlined his recent talks in Moscow on Russian diplomatic efforts to help settle the crisis. He stressed that a lasting political solution would be possible only if the Alliance's five conditions were met and expressed his hope that Russia would be able to use its influence to convince President Milosevic to comply. Alliance would not disagree if Russian economy diluted of corruption will be involved (in brackets) in this meaningless war or just to wage at last the third world war and for Russian territory to be harrowed by European and Asian capitals. But Russian did not have this lure.
6 May, allies are united in their resolve to pursue their goals in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY). NATO's military actions will continue until there is a clear indication that President Milosevic agrees to all 5 conditions set out at the Washington Summit. The G8 Foreign Ministers' meeting (Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and even Russia was invited), which was held in Bonn, agreed a set of principles which reflect NATO's conditions.
12 May it is marked that NATO air campaign has inflicted heavy damage on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia's military infrastructure and seriously degraded the ability of Belgrade's military machine to continue ‘its onslaught’ in Kosovo. However, President Milosevic has yet to meet NATO objectives (that is “world community” objectives). He has to withdraw his troops for then NATO troops to come in Kosovo.
14 May, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson condemns ethnic cleansing in Kosovo perhaps relying on global television information.
18 May, visit to NATO by Dr. Ibrahim Rugova, Leader of the Democratic League of Kosovo; that is he visited NATO HQ and not EC or UNO since NATO is the master of situation, the main contractor of this ordered war.
19 May, NATO reports: The NATO air campaign has continued to inflict heavy damage on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia's military infrastructure. Over half of the Yugoslav Air Force's frontline combat aircraft have been destroyed, and 75% of the fixed surface to air missile sites. NATO has also destroyed a third of all the Serb heavy equipment in Kosovo and 50% of the ammunition storage, together with a large proportion of the Serbs' command and control network and infrastructure. Vigorous diplomatic efforts are being pursued in parallel for a political solution to the crisis in line with the requirements set out by the Washington Summit and the G8 Foreign Ministers' statement. It is ridiculous when they bomb ‘military targets’ by pin-point method and number of refugees is already 750 thousands.
20 May, visit to NATO by Italian Prime Minister, Massimo D’Alema. He issues a statement proposing a halt to the bombing in Yugoslavia for three days pending an accord by NATO nations and Russia on a draft UN Security Council resolution. But his speech made some discord in unified choir of those who did with “fascist” regime. More likely to blame these allies in state kind of fascism.
26 May, more than 30,000 sorties have been flown as part of NATO's air campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia's (FRY) military forces. Over one third of the Yugoslav Air Force's frontline combat aircraft and 75% of fixed surface to air missile sites have now been destroyed, along with over one third of Serb heavy forces on the ground in Kosovo. Serb forces remaining in Kosovo are suffering great difficulty in moving around, and are becoming increasingly isolated. At the same period they’ve deployed refugees’ camps in Albania, Macedonia, and Montenegro. What was the most important is that Alliance announced for the first time in history the leader of the state accused in military crimes against humanity including murders and violent deportations . It is not by chance that even in the name of Hague tribunal on “former” Yugoslavia the purpose of the “world community” is already determined in advance. All these gentlmen from NATO “world community” want Yugoslavia no more exist, became “former”. This is why they write so insistently in all official papers the “former Yugoslav Republic Macedonia”. This is an element of information war – effect on subconsiousness by using ‘correct’ wording. Thus NATO officials together with UN bureaucracy appointed guilty for the war in Yugoslavia in accordance with scenario developed in advance. And now NATO wants to put an end to “crisis in Kosovo” at four fronts:
1) The air campaign continues to intensify, with increasing success;
2) NATO is supporting the vigorous diplomatic efforts to achieve a negotiated settlement, while also working closely with neighbouring nations to ensure that the crisis does not spread;
3) Substantial assistance continues to be given to the humanitarian efforts in the region. The Alliance's vital support has been welcomed by the UNHCR;
4) In conjunction with other organisations, NATO is participating in the development of a long-term strategy for South East Europe, to try and ensure lasting stability for the region (better to say “is ruling” – АB) long-term strategy in South East Europe to guarantee stability in the region.
8 June, the Alliance welcomes the agreement announced on 8 June at the G8 Foreign Ministers' conference on a draft United Nations Security Council resolution on Kosovo that, among other things, provides for an international security presence in Kosovo, with substantial NATO participation and under unified command. No more demands about Serbian troops’ withdrawal, on the contrary, the military pressure on Milosevic regime is intensified. “Meanwhile”, KFOR (Kosovo Force) is building up its forces in the ‘Former’ Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 18 countries, including 13 Partners, have expressed their interest in participating with force contributions. The partners of NATO are: Argentina, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Jordan, Latvia, Lithuania, Morocco, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, UAE and Ukraine. The total of ground forces committed so far is approximately 48,000.
On 10 June 1999, a Military Technical Agreement (MTA) for the withdrawal of all Serb forces from Kosovo finally was signed. 11 June, the NATO Secretary General announced the suspension of the air campaign after confirmation from SACEUR that Serb forces had started their full withdrawal. That night the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 1244 (1999). UNSCR 1244 authorises member states and relevant international organisations to establish an international security presence in Kosovo “for security and stability”.
12 June, the first elements of KFOR, under General Jackson (COMKFOR), started deploying into Kosovo. KFOR will work in close co-ordination with the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK). At the same time NATO's forces have continued their support for humanitarian efforts in Albania. Similarly rear elements of KFOR remain in Macedonia to provide both humanitarian assistance to aid agencies and support for NATO forces in Kosovo.
In principle they have dealt with Yugoslavian independence. Foreign troops are deployed on its territory under UN and NATO flags. The issue of Belgrade regime to be replaced with more loyal to world capitalism is just technical issue as well as getting the former Yugoslavian president to the court as guilty in war. In the meantime international fussing around on after-war “humanitarian things” proceeds, some sort of demonstrating subservience to NATO and its masters from the USA.
What were Yugoslavian ‘fruits’ of this war? More than 2000 people died, about 7000 injured. Material damage is estimated as 200 billion dollars. That was the ransom of Serbs for “Rachak” provocation and for null “Potkova”. 10 June, 1999 air strikes had been ended. Yugoslavia was forced to sign NATO documents on canceling operations: to withdraw Serbian troops from Kosovo and not to hinder deploying of “peacekeeping” forces in Kosovo. Intervention-peacemaking troops firmly settled in Kosovo province. They were confused a bit by Russian paratroopers’ battalion insolence from Bosnia when they took over Pristina airport without any command from NATO bosses; this was some contribution in Yugoslavian “pacification” with Russian peculiarity.
However the tiff of the Serbs themselves in this war is not so small. They have elected their leader S.Milosevic; he expressed their will and not his own. It has started as it seems to from trifle. Началось, казалось бы, с пустяка. In1986 one memorandum appeared in Belgrade that was prepared by Serbian Academy of Science on national issue. There was said about “suppression of Serbs in Croatian and Kosovo”. Ideas of academicians became the ideology of the Great Serbia and bottom of catchy policy of S.Milosevic. The Great Serbia should embrace Serbia itself, Montenegro, half of Bosnia and eastern part of Croatia. The idea turned tragedy primarily for Serbs; though it allowed for Milosevic to rule within 13 years until myth of Great Serbia wreck .
Milosevic played national feeling of Serbs. He achieved the adoption of new Serbian constitution where national autonomy of Kosovo was practically liquidated. Serbian nation supported Milosevic. «Serbia» had bowed out easily with Slovenia and Macedonia as they had not Serbian lands. However they refuse to let Croatia and Bosnia go since there live a lot of Serbs on the territories which were supposed to join Serbia according Milosevic plan. In 1992 Croatian Serbs formed quite independent state on Croatian territory, Serpska Krajina. They did ask for independence and international arbitrators proposed them special status. In the name of Krajina leader according yankeeish version of history Milosevic got competitors at Serbian Olympus. So Milosevic rejected this plan. In August 1995 when F.Tudjman sent tanks to Krajina did nothing to help congeners. And in 1994 when it was needed to punish Bosnian Serbs leader R.Karajic for naughtiness since he refuse to bury the hatchet with Croats and Muslims and imposed blockade of Republic Serpska (RS) leaving yesterday’s allies for the mercy of fate. In 1995 he had signed unpleasant for Serbs Dayton’s peace document agreeing with enormous losses of territory. In 1999 experiencing pressure of bombing blackmail Yugoslavian leadership actually had lost its control over territory. NATO troops were deployed in sovereign country occupying the whole province and establishing military base there. S.Milosevic had lost his power. “Socialism” was over.
What employers and contractors of Yugoslavian war had received? The USA had checked their precision location weapon and acquired the second bigger military base after Bosnia, that one in Kosovo. Germany for the first time since 1945 used their Bundeswehr forces abroad. Membership of NATO increased by three members and they showed their loyalty to American and European capital troops. They could not manage to get Russia involved in war with NATO and USA. Although this opportunity was suggested very insistently; ethnic and religious commonness gave a hope that Russian will provide S-300 missiles and even nuclear weapon for an adequate response to NATO aggressors. It would mean the point of no return for the third world war. And this war would be waged for the vast ‘unexplored’ territories of the former USSR, unexplored by world capitalist gangs of Eurasia. It means that Russia, China, Central Asia and perhaps India are territories under discussion. We don’t exclude the probability of dilution of main rival that is Japan through destruction of its living environment and further to Middle and Far East. Russian elite was wise enough not to interfere in the war. Russia was enough with “chechenian front” that was newly opened in October 1999 reviving state nationalism of old empire.
The main ‘achievement of the war’ is that for the first time in new era one aggressor dared to meddle in deals of independent nation without UNO sanction It is proved once again that provocations is normal practice in history of wars. Civilised countries even identified guilty for the military actions in Yugoslavia who was legally elected president of the Republic.
War with Yugoslavia or “Allied Force” operation included preparatory stage of 62 days. This means it has started approximately on 21 January 1999. It is clear that 16 NATO members (and quickly accepted in March three more countries – Poland, Hungary and Czech for to them to be pledged by blood) made a decision about the war not in January but long before. Since the active phase of KLA soldiers training by CIA instructors had being carried out yet in 1998. And strategic purpose that was to do with even mentioning socialism in Europe was still unfinished. Future seat of war had being filled with aviation mainly. Air option of invasion is seemed safer than that by land. Military operations themselves lasted 80 days. 730 military jets made more than 30 thousand taking offs. Average cost of one taking off was about 10 thousand dollars, the cost of operation of one aircraft-carrier per day was from 330 to 600 thousand dollars. In course of Yugoslavian “operation” they spent some 3 billion dollars. Gorgeous gift of NATO to itself by the 50 year jubilation!

Part 3